1237 risposte a questa discussione

[willy_revenge]

...non il costo del tablet...ti ho chiesto il costo della cover...

 

Ah scusa, 779€

[ally]

 

... ...

[willy_revenge]

eheheh trollissimo 

[ally]

Ah scusa, 779€

 

...senza cover ovviamente visto il prezzaccio...vero?...

[ally]

eheheh trollissimo 

 

...mi sa che mela ti ha trollato piu' di me ...

[mapomac]

Anche la mia fa un po' quel difetto

[guyver77]

Anche la mia fa un po' quel difetto

non ti aspettare lo stesso trattamento di uilli !

lui è un crapple fag dai tempi che furono

mi ricordo ancora quando il giorno prima dello storico kinotto osannava i mac g5 che andavano il doppio dei pc intel

e dopo il kn8 osannava i nuovi mac intel che andavano il doppio dei vecchi G5...

 

non puoi pretendere che mamma crapple ti rimborsi una cover fallata , alla fine a qualcuno devono pur rifilarle

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[willy_revenge]

misà che sbagli utente eh

 

 

sempre sostenuto l'inferiorità dei motorola rispetto a, mentre mia madre succhia cazzi, intel, passato a osx solo con i core2duo

Messaggio modificato da willy_revenge il 16 dicembre 2013 - 16:01

[mapomac]

Ho lollato a sempre

[ally]

 

DP: In many ways, the Mac Pro is the fastest and most powerful Mac ever made. But today, as it stands, it’s not a drop-in improvement that will instantly make any and every setup faster — its greatest tricks are enabled when software is specifically tuned to this hardware. Because this Mac Pro is now the de facto professional computer for crapple users, most important apps are virtually certain to be upgraded to support its particulars. There’s clearly plenty of power here for almost any use case, but while we wait for software updates this machine isn’t a particularly notable upgrade from the last-generation Pro, or the latest iMac. Or even, in some ways, the most recent MacBook Pro with Retina display. A combination of those three machines covers the entire studio floor of The Verge’s offices, and I’ve found virtually no one itching to trade them all for Mac Pros just yet.

RD: Already, the new Pro would be able to do everything my current tower can do, but for the cost of the upgrade, I’m not sure it does enough extra stuff that it would be worth it just yet.

JL: When I first heard about the new Mac Pro, like many other video professionals my first thought was "finally." Finally, crapple is paying attention to us again. Finally, we won't accidentally kick our massive workstations, or cut ourselves on their handles. Finally, the desktop computer is getting some real attention in 2013.

The new Mac Pro is an undeniably serious and powerful machine aimed at professionals. But it's also incredibly expensive, and at least from my Adobe-centric perspective, it's not quite worth the outlay right now. The day-to-day performance is similar enough to that of the iMac that I'd have a difficult time convincing my boss to spend double the money on this computer, plus a monitor, plus the Thunderbolt peripherals I'd need to make it a viable solution — at least, not until Adobe makes its suite shine on the new hardware the way Final Cut Pro X does. At the end of the day, I'm back to hoping, but this time that third-party developers step up.

 

 

...http://www.theverge....pro-review-2013...

[ally]

...nessuno che ne parla? > http://www.anandtech...eview-late-2013 ...

[ally]

 

...nessun problema di temperatura ...sulle performance non mi esprimo ...

[ally]

 

 

... ...

[willy_revenge]

Temperature sotto Windows

Also non ti esprimere, meglio

[willy_revenge]

Also la config base

[:dissident:]

Also la config base

 

Certo, visti i prezzi sarà la più venduta

E di PRO ha molto poco

[ally]

Also la config base

 

...appunto...per eguagliare un imac del 2012 devi sganciare 8k€ ...senza monitor ...

[Berling]

http://www.ispazio.n...ltro-smartphone

 

 

[willy_revenge]

Old

[toyo]

è solo perché non ti hanno fatto i test berling